February 16, 2017
Valentine's Day was anything but a love-fest in the U.S. health care insurance industry. In the face of strong resistance from federal regulators and recent court setbacks concerned with stifling competition in the health insurance market, Aetna and Humana abandoned their plans to merge, and within hours, CIGNA sought to end its merger plans with Anthem.
According to Aetna's press release, Aetna will pay Humana $1 billion as a result of terminating the merger agreement. Additionally, Aetna announced that it has terminated its previously announced agreement to sell certain Medicare Advantage assets to Molina Healthcare, Inc. and will pay the applicable fees associated with that termination.
Terminating the Anthem-CIGNA deal appears to be anything but mutual. After the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia blocked the deal on antitrust grounds, CIGNA sued Anthem for $1.85 billion in reverse termination fees and for over $13 billion in additional damages. The next day, however, on February 15, 2017, Anthem turned around and sued CIGNA, seeking to block termination of the merger and to compel performance with the terms of the agreement.
Also, Humana announced plans to exit the Marketplace in 2018 in the 11 states it currently is participating in, dealing a blow to the continued viability of the public exchanges, as fewer plans on the Marketplace means that there is less competition between companies that could help drive down plan prices. Many companies, including, Humana, Aetna and United Healthcare had already scaled back participation in the Marketplace for 2017.
We will continue to monitor developments in the U.S. health care industry as they occur and their impact to employers, especially in light of anticipated changes to the Affordable Care Act in the months ahead.
For additional information, please contact your Burnham Benefits Consultant or Burnham Benefits at 949-833-2983 or email@example.com.
Burnham Benefits does not engage in the practice of law and this publication should not be construed as the providing of legal advice or a legal opinion of any kind. The consulting advice we provide is intended solely to assist in assessing its compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and other applicable federal and state law requirements, and is based on Burnham Benefit’s interpretation of federal guidance in effect as of the date of this publication. To the best of our knowledge, the information provided herein, and assumptions relied on, are reasonable and accurate as of the date of this publication. Furthermore, to ensure compliance with IRS Circular 230, any tax advice contained in this publication is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter.